~ Raghvendra Singh.
Syama Prasad Mookerjee passed on to the great beyond on June 23, 1953. A minister in undivided Bengal and in Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru’s cupboard, Mookerjee was once a outstanding Opposition chief and founding father of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh. He was once detained with out trial via Sheikh Abdullah’s govt after his arrest in Kathua on May 11, 1953.
On June 30, 1953, Nehru wrote to Jogmaya Devi, Mookerjee’s mom, conveying his condolences. On July 4, Devi answered: “My son died in detention, detention without trial. You say, you had visited Kashmir during my son’s detention. You speak of the affection you had for him. But what prevented you, I wonder, from meeting him there personally and satisfying yourself about his health and arrangements?… Ever since his detention there, the first information that I, his mother, received from the Government of Jammu and Kashmir was that my son was no more… and in what cruel cryptic way the message was conveyed.” Further verbal exchange between Devi and Nehru makes for a tragic studying.
Much later, on November 27, 1953, a answer was once moved within the West Bengal legislative meeting to carry an inquiry into the instances of his loss of life whilst in detention in Kashmir. It argued for containing an inquiry via a fee headed via a Supreme Court pass judgement on. Surprisingly, an meeting member from the Congress celebration, Shankar Prasad Mitra, moved an modification to this answer soliciting for the phrases “for holding an inquiry”, to be substituted with “for requesting the Government of Jammu and Kashmir to hold an inquiry”. He additionally sought that the sentence “by appointing a Commission with the Judge of the Supreme Court of India to serve as Chairman of the Commission,” be not noted. Many who actively hostile the modification puzzled why Bidhan Chandra Roy, the Congress leader minister of West Bengal, who idea an inquiry to be essential, had later declined it. Mookerjee, in spite of everything, have been an excellent good friend of the manager minister’s. What have been requested for was once an inquiry via a SC pass judgement on who may take cognisance of proof from any place, together with Kashmir. In this example, the Kashmir govt was once the accused celebration. How may it then take a seat in judgement over this inquiry? But contributors of the Congress, together with Roy, argued in want of the modification. The Congress, in impact, sought acceptance of the modification, and succeeded.
The West Bengal govt forwarded the answer handed within the meeting to the Ministry of States (Kashmir segment), Government of India. This letter was once won on February 23, 1954. After six months, the subject was once sooner or later processed within the Ministry of States. The following is the commentary from the related report within the Ministry: “It is for attention whether or not we would possibly tell the Government of West Bengal that because the subject essentially considerations the Government of J&Ok, the Government of India didn’t believe it correct to pursue the subject. When the request for an inquiry into the instances of Shri Syama Prasad Mukherjee’s loss of life was once raised in Parliament, the angle which we followed was once that this was once an issue which involved the Government of J&Ok by myself. The answer handed via the West Bengal Legislative Assembly is in keeping with this stand because it simplest asks the Government of India to go at the request to the Jammu & Kashmir Government. We have now two lessons open to us: We would possibly both ship the replica of the answer and lawsuits to J&Ok Government for such motion as they’ll believe essential; or we would possibly go back the lawsuits to the West Bengal Government and ask them to deal with the J&Ok Government themselves. While the latter direction may well be strictly right kind one, it will have the impact of rebuff to the Government of West Bengal the place Dr Mukherjee’s loss of life has agitated the general public thoughts very a lot. There would possibly due to this fact, be no hurt if we undertake the primary choice. I don’t assume that is most probably to present upward thrust to any false impression with the J&Ok Government.” KNV Nambisan from the Ministry of States signed this word on September 7, 1954. The first direction was once agreed upon via each the secretary and the minister. On September 22, 1954, the Ministry of States ahead the answer to the Chief Secretary of Jammu and Kashmir, for such motion as thought to be essential. Nothing got here out of this regimen letter despatched via the Ministry of States to the Government of J&Ok.
A realize for a starred query was once given in Parliament on August 19, 1954 — the Minister of Home Affairs was once requested to explain whether or not the Bengal CM had visited Kashmir in June 1954 and made an enquiry about Mookerjee’s loss of life. On July 20, 1954, the Ministry of States had requested the Jammu and Kashmir leader secretary in regards to the reported seek advice from of Roy. On July 19, 1954, the Ministry of States had written to the Lok Sabha secretariat mentioning that that they had no knowledge apart from what seemed within the newspaper in regards to the keep of Roy in Jammu and Kashmir. The letter additional mentioned that the instances in terms of the loss of life of Mookerjee, whilst in detention, was once an issue which involved the Jammu and Kashmir govt, no longer the GoI. On August 5, 1954, Ghulam Ahmad, leader secretary of Jammu and Kashmir wrote to V Narayanan, joint secretary to the GoI (Ministry of States): “Dr BC Roy did come to Kashmir for a vacation and spent a few month right here. During his keep he visited quite a lot of attractiveness spots within the Valley. He did see the bungalow the place the past due Dr Mukherjee was once hanging up all over his keep in Kashmir in addition to the room within the sanatorium to which he have been got rid of previous to his loss of life. Col. Sir Ram Nath Chopra, our Director Health Services, took him to the sanatorium at some point and Dr BC Roy would possibly have made some verbal enquiries at the spot. You will, due to this fact, see that no legitimate inquiry was once held via the Doctor and as such no document will have been submitted via him. The query within the Lok Sabha would possibly, due to this fact, be responded suitably at the foundation of this knowledge.”
The important subject of inquiry into the loss of life of Mookerjee rested thereafter.
This article first seemed within the print version of Indian Express on June 20, 2019 below the identify ‘A lacking inquiry’. The author was once a senior IAS officer, and situated remaining because the CEO-DMCS, Government of India,
“Source of This Article:- “https://hinduexistence.org/2022/06/23/the-missing-inquiry-into-the-death-of-syama-prasad-mookerjee/
Sell Your Internet Make Money 100% Real 1GB = $1:-
“We sharing content only for awareness purpose. If you are the owner of this content or material and want to remove this then Mail us, We will remove it as soon as Possible.”
"Contact Us:-" "News Fall Out"
"Address : New Delhi, India"
"Email : [email protected]"
- “Whatsapp No.: +91-9716588082″
- “Websites : www.newsfallout.com
#lacking #inquiry #mysterious #loss of life #Syama #Prasad #Mookerjee